More rationale for using MTurk

An interesting article (you can  download it for free) argues that MTurk is a great place to sample underrepresented populations. Examples:

  • They can be used to study job search behaviors: “Although inappropriate for many types of organizational research, a readily available sample of unemployed individuals may be useful
    for answering research questions pertaining to job search behaviors, out-
    comes regarding unemployment, and the like. Thus, in this sense, MTurk
    does offer a valuable resource for understanding individuals often ignored
    in organizational research.”
  • They can be used to study job satisfaction: “On the basis of this assumption of underemployment,MTurk samples may be an interesting population to examine research questions related to disengagement, job satisfaction, job insecurity, and fulfillment of needs. Here again, MTurk is potentially useful for surveying groups not traditionally represented in the literature MTurk samples may be an interesting population to examine research questions related to disengagement, job satisfaction, job insecurity, and fulfillment of needs. Here again, MTurk is potentially useful for surveying groups not traditionally represented in the literature.”
  • They represent the leading edge of the new economy:
    “… as the economy creates the need for more individuals to take
    on“gig-based”jobs,perhapsMTurksampleswillincreasinglycometoreflect
    an emerging contingent of the working population that did not exist 10 years
    ago. Given this emerging trend and the fact that MTurk samples do seem to
    provide some much-needed diversity, we would argue that, although MTurk
    is not THE solution to our WEIRD sampling problem in the organizational
    sciences, it does represent a small step in the right direction.”

The authors end with this:”With that said, samples obtained online can offer many advantages over traditional methods, but effective utilization of this research requires both creative and clever designs as well as vigilance on the part of the researcher. Crowdsourced studies present unique challenges to researchers, but then again, no one ever guaranteed that convenience samples would be entirely convenient.” BOOM!

Citation: Keith, M. G., & Harms, P. D. (2016). Is Mechanical Turk the Answer to Our Sampling Woes?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(01), 162-167.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s