Turkers attracted to low pay/high volume HITS?

That’s the conclusion from a recent study:

“These results suggest that AMT workers use the pricing of individual tasks as a signal in order to assess the difficulty of tasks when choosing among HIT groups,
particularly low prices in order to assess easiness.
As a consequence, workers might be collectively driven towards high
volume but low price tasks since they would select HIT Groups in terms of their expected
wages, and since low price would signal easiness, in a sense “like” a more detailed
description. This interpretation could explain why we do not find any elasticity of work
supply in our dataset with respect to the pricing of individual tasks, even when this pricing
changes for the same task.”
I have to admit, though, much of this paper was way over my head.
Find it here and explain what it means to me please: http://ipp.oii.ox.ac.uk/sites/ipp/files/documents/IPP2014.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s